Cox v. Sargent
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the District Court of La Plata County.
1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.
The principal inquiry suggested by this record respects the right of the defendant in a replevin suit which has been dismissed at the plaintiff’s costs, wherein the judgment entered does not adjudge a return of the property to him, or find its value to recover in an action on the replevin bond the value of the property taken by the plaintiff.
In 1892, the Hansen Produce Company obtained a judgment against the Durango Packing Company which was a copartnership composed of E. C. Arnold and II. W. Cox for $782.01 with costs. On the 24th of June the plaintiffs sued out an execution from the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boley v. GriswoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
- Berghoff v. HeckwolfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Smith v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Persse v. WatrousSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens' State Bank v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Rudolph v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
- Gallup v. WortmannColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
- Denver Truck Exchange, Inc. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Eisenhart v. McGarryColorado Court of Appeals · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.