Legal Opinion

Bowling v. Chambers

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1904No. 2376PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the County Court of Archuleta County.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

September 15,1900, there was lodged in the office of the cleric of this court what purported to be an authenticated copy of the record in this case.

Defendants in error, June 20,1901, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the record filed had been authenticated by the judge of the county court of Archuleta county, and not by the cleric, there being at the time of such authentication a duly appointed cleric.

Plaintiff in error conceded this point to be well taken, and asked leave to withdraw the record for the purpose of having the same duly authenticated.

This motion to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  2. Fisher v. Denver National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  3. Drescher v. FulhamColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Winne v. Colorado Springs Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1876
  5. Rudolph v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Benge's Administrator v. EversoleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. People ex rel. Stidger v. HoranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Graham v. PeppleMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Creighton v. CampbellColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Creighton v. CampbellColorado Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API