Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Pacemaker Investment Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1973No. 7327SC653PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.BALEY, Judge.

Plaintiffs make two basic contentions: (1) that the restrictive covenants applying to Robinson Heights Subdivision forbid the construction of any dwelling within 15 feet of the interior lot lines of Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Block E as shown on the original plat of the subdivision; and (2) that defendants are “attempting to violate” the restrictive covenants by petitioning authorities to permit, withdrawal of unused streets in the subdivision and by proposing to widen other streets.

Defendant Baugh has resubdivided Lots 3, 4 and 5 and one-half of Lot 6 to make new lots designated as 3A,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Donaldson v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Donaldson v. ShearinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API