Legal Opinion · Dissent

Donaldson v. Shearin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 6, 2001No. COA00-276Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

I would affirm the trial court’s dissolution of the preliminary injunction and denial of the permanent injunction. “[Restrictive servitudes are in derogation of the free and unfettered use of land.” Callaham v. Arenson, 239 N.C. 619, 625, 80 S.E.2d 619, 624 (1954); see also, Ingle v. Stubbins, 240 N.C. 382, 82 S.E. 2d 388 (1954); 1 Patrick K. Hetrick & James B. McLaughlin, Jr., Webster’s Real Estate Law in North Carolina § 18-6, at 840 (5th ed. 1999).

The covenants and agreements which impose such restrictions must be “strictly construed against limitation on use.” Callaham at 625, 80 S.E.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Robinson v. Pacemaker Investment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API