Legal Opinion
Tamer Turgun v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 2, 2026No. 3:23-cv-23214Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TAMER TURGUN, Civil No. 23-23214 (MAS) (RLS) Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OPINION Vv. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORP., Defendant. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation’s (“PATH” or “Defendant”) Motion for New Trial or Remittitur of the Award for Medical Expenses (the “Motion”). (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiff Tamer Turgun (‘Plaintiff’) opposed (ECF No. 92), and PATH replied (ECF No. 93). The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Sandra Cortez v. Trans UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Celia Gumbs and James Gumbs v. Pueblo International, Inc. D/B/A Pueblo Supermarkets. Appeal of Pueblo International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.