Legal Opinion

Sandra Cortez v. Trans Union

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 13, 2010No. 08-2465, 08-2466PublishedCited by 412 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEE, Chief Judge.

Sandra Cortez appeals the district court’s order remitting a jury’s punitive damages award of $750,000 to $100,000 on claims she brought under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), codified at 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681X. 1 In its cross-appeal, Trans Union, LLC appeals the district court’s order denying its motion for judgment as a matter of law and rejecting Trans Union’s challenge to the jury’s compensatory damages award of $50,000. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the district court’s orders. 2

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual History

This dispute began when Cortez…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by412 opinions

  1. TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. Edward Seamans v. Temple UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  3. Simmsparris v. Countrywide Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. John Shaw v. Experian Information SolutionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Andrew Leonard v. Stemtech International IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016

407 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API