Legal Opinion
Danpar Associates v. Falkha
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided September 18, 1981No. FILE NO. 969PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment for the defendants in a summary process action seeking possession of the leased premises for nonpayment of rent. The only issues raised are (1) whether a default occurred in payment of the rent and (2) whether the landlord effectively exercised its option to terminate the lease prior to the time the tenants made a tender of the delinquent rent.
The subordinate facts are not disputed. The defendants were in possession of premises used as a beauty parlor in a shopping center under a ten-year written lease with the plaintiff’s predecessor in title. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Nicoli v. Frouge Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Kovner v. DubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fellows v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sandrew v. Pequot Drug, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Dairy Mart, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Zitomer v. PalmerConnecticut Superior Court · 1982
- Seven Fifty Main Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. SpectorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.