Legal Opinion

Kovner v. Dubin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1926PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The demurrer to the plea in abatement in this court questions the legal sufficiency of the three grounds of abatement. The second of these is that it does not appear that the writ was allowed by a judge or clerk of the City Court, and the third is that the bill of exceptions was not filed within forty-eight hours from the entry of the judgment of the City Court. Both of these grounds are untenable, and counsel stated in argument that they were not pressed. The first and only ground of abatement then, which we are called upon to consider, is whether the law requires that the paper served upon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thompson v. CoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Benjamin v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  3. Gradle v. WarnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Bowman v. FootSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  5. Camp v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Rosa v. CristinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Sandrew v. Pequot Drug, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. Tseka v. ScherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API