Legal Opinion
Diglio v. Gray Dorchester Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff and new trial granted on damages for future pain and suffering only unless defendant, within 20 days of service of a copy of the order of this Court with notice of entry, stipulates to increase the verdict to $50,000 for future pain and suffering, in which event the order is modified accordingly and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this action arising out of personal injuries *912sustained by plaintiff, the jury awarded plaintiff $23,000 for past lost…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nicastro v. ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Harris v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Harris v. ArmstrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Wroblewski v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kosinski v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- Simmons v. Dendis Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Harding v. OnibokunNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- Hornicek v. YonchikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Lamphron-Read v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Hunter v. East Rochester Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.