Legal Opinion

Harris v. Armstrong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 4, 1983PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff concedes that on the record herein the trial court’s decision to set aside the verdict as against defendant Donald Van Liere was proper. We agree. It was improper, however, to set aside the verdict as to the owner-occupant, Lessie Cool. No objections or exceptions were made to the court’s instructions to the jury and a series of questions for the jury were submitted with the acquiescence of all counsel. To the extent that the issues have been preserved for our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bichler v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Boyle v. GretchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Eddy v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Petrovski v. FornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Sorel v. IacobucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Wertzberger v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Bolles v. County of CattaraugusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API