Legal Opinion

Harris v. Armstrong

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1984PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In our court appellant executors of the estate of Lessie Cool* urge reversal on two grounds, namely, that the decision of the *702trial court setting aside the jury’s verdict and dismissing the complaint against them was proper, and that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jurors. Both contentions must be rejected. We address them in reverse order.

With respect to the latter contention, it suffices to observe that the assertion of error in the trial court’s charge to the jury has not been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Engel v. LightermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Up-Front Industries, Inc. v. U. S. Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Glielmi v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Petrovski v. FornesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Kwasny v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Sorel v. IacobucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API