Legal Opinion

Thorp Small Business Investment Corp. v. Gass

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The trial court was without jurisdiction to correct the judgment (1) unless such amendment was made within the year provided for in sec. 269.46 (1), Stats., or (2) unless the correction was to make the judgment conform to what the court had actually pronounced. We are persuaded that the amendment of the judgment did not qualify within either of these requirements, and, accordingly, there was no jurisdiction to amend the judgment.

1. The Application of Sec. 269.46 (1), Stats.

This section of the statutes authorizes the court to relieve a party from a mistake “at any time within one year after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fischbeck v. MielenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Bloor v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State Ex Rel. Hall v. CowieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. GREEN TREE ESTATES, INC. v. FurstenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Bischoff v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Central Credit Union v. BayleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. ConwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Green v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tuszkiewicz v. LepinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API