State Central Credit Union v. Bayley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
Neither defendant’s petition to vacate and discharge the cognovit judgment, nor the order of the county court appealed from, specifies any statute as being applicable. There was no oral or memorandum decision rendered by the county court so the record is barren of the ground on which the county court’s order vacating and discharging the cognovit judgment was grounded. The issues on this appeal, as we view them, are:(1) Does either sec. 269.46 (1), Stats., or sec. 270.91 (2), authorize the entry of the order appealed from?(2) If neither of these two statutes is applicable, did the county…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boynton v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Reedsburg BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- McDermott v. Lumbermen's National Bank of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Weber v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Vande Voort v. SternWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Flatley v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. CampbellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Estate of BootsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Walker v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- King v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.