Legal Opinion

Bischoff v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1963PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

“For justice, tho’ she’s painted blind

Is to the weaker side inclin’d.”

—Samuel Butler, Hudibras, Part III, Canto III.

The equities of this case are strikingly in favor of Mrs. Bischoff. The latter was Mrs. Hoyt’s friend, nurse, and companion for almost seven years. Mrs. Hoyt’s will clearly expressed her intention to have Mrs. Bischoff enjoy the benefits which would have resulted from the testamentary exercise of her power of appointment in favor of Mrs. Bischoff. A nephew of Mrs. Hoyt, Michael J. Cudahy, vigorously supported Mrs. Bischoff’s position in this court.

However, regardless of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. TysonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Uihlein v. UihleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bischoff v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Thorp Small Business Investment Corp. v. GassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chelminska v. First Wisconsin Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. BischoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. First Wisconsin Trust Co. v. BischoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API