Workers' Compensation Claim of Coleman v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
Worker’s compensation death benefits were denied to the surviving spouse and children of James Coleman based upon intoxication as a cause of death. The district court certified the appeal to us pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b). The denial is supported by substantial evidence and the law which makes such important benefits payable in appropriate circumstances. We affirm.
I. ISSUES
Appellants make a concise and direct statement of the issues:
A. Can the Division meet its burden of proof regarding intoxication through evidence which fails to establish, as a matter of law, either that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Casper Oil Co. v. EvensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Haagensen v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. EspinozaWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Erhart v. Flint Engineering & ConstructionWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Sheneman v. Division of Workers' Safety & Compensation Internal Hearing UnitWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Taylor v. Wyoming Board of MedicineWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.