Legal Opinion
Erhart v. Flint Engineering & Construction
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1997No. 96-224PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONNELL, District Judge.
The debate in this case is whether a claimant, who was denied worker’s compensation benefits and failed to appeal the adverse decision in the manner provided in the Buies for Contested Case Practice and Procedure Before the Office of Administrative Hearings, can reopen his case under Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-605(a) (1991) or W.R.C.P. 60(b). Michael A. Erhart (Erhart) filed a claim in Wyoming for worker’s compensation benefits for a work-related injury. The hearing examiner ultimately determined Erhart’s injury occurred in Colorado in August of 1992, and denied benefits.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parker Land & Cattle Co. v. Wyoming Game & Fish CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Rasmussen v. BakerWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
- Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Hatten R. Co. v. Baylies Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cross v. Berg Lumber CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Claim of Shaffer v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Painovich v. PainovichWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.