Worker's Compensation Claim of Haagensen v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Chief Justice.
The sole issue presented is whether the finding of the hearing examiner that Howard 0. Haagensen sustained injuries “arising out of and in the course of employment” as required by Wyo. Stat. § 27-14-102(a)(xi) (Cum.Supp.1995) is supported by substantial evidence. The finding is controverted since' Mr. Haagensen fell in the parking lot of his employer, Nelson’s Oil and Gas, two and one-half to three hours after ending his work shift. We agree with the district court’s finding that Mr. Haagensen’s injury did not occur in the course of his employment and, therefore, affirm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Casper Oil Co. v. EvensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. WhiteWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Anastos v. General Chemical Soda AshWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Division v. BarkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Ball v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Hicks v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Phillips v. TIC—The Industrial Co. of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.