Riverside Land & Irrigating Co. v. Jensen
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order refusing a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The defendant in the present action was executrix of the last will of Cornelius Jensen, deceased, and the devisee thereunder of the land the title to which was sought to be quieted. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Action to quiet title. Plaintiff had judgment, from which and an order denying her motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
*1471. The objection of defendant to the introduction in evidence of the judgment-roll in the action of Riverside Land & Irrigating Company v. Cornelius Jensen was properly overruled. That was an action brought by the plaintiff here against the testator and predecessor in interest of this defendant to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain lands, including the premises in controversy in this action, and in which final judgment was entered quieting plaintiff’s title to the land in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Marshall v. ShafterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Heeser v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Rough v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- People ex rel. Love v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Ahlers v. SmileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Rauer v. RyndCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Smith v. KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Klumpke v. HenleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.