Legal Opinion
A. B. Dick Co. v. Marr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 26, 1946No. 97PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decree awarding the plaintiff profits arising from sales of stencil sheets by the defendant which were held to have infringed U. S. Letters Patent No. 1,526,982. Claims 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 16, 18, 21 and 22 of the patent were held valid and infringed in an interlocutory decree granted by Judge Patterson. A master was appointed to ascertain and report defendant’s profits, and the latter’s report was confirmed by.the trial court which fixed profits realized by the defendant as reported by the master.
The patent in suit has been before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- AB Dick Co. v. Simplicator CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- A. B. Dick Co. v. Shallcross Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Arlac Dry Stencil Corp. v. A. B. Dick Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Aerosol Research Company v. Scovill Manufacturing Company (A. Schrader's Son Division)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Clair v. Kastar, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Archawski v. HaniotiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955