Legal Opinion
Archawski v. Hanioti
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, District Judge.
After a decree had been entered in favor of libellants, respondent moved to vacate the decree as one entered upon a default and to vacate the order for body execution entered in connection with that decree. Both motions are denied.
The trial of this action was duly scheduled for November 23, 1954. On that date the attorneys of record for the respondent Hanioti appeared before the court, stating they had been unable to get in touch with their client, had no idea where he could be reached, and did not know when or if he would return. They conceded that he was already in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Morris v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Todd Shipyards Corporation v. the City of AthensDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
- African Metals Corp. v. BullowaNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- In RE v. Loewer's Gambrinus Brewery Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Archawski v. HaniotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ariate Compania Nav., SA v. COMMONWEALTH OF TANKSHIP OWNERS, LTD.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- R. v. Archawski, Libellants-Appellees v. Basil Hanioti Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- R. v. Archawski, Libellants-Appellees v. Basil Hanioti Etc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956