Legal Opinion

Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1936No. 767 and 768PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The subject of this controversy is the measure of petitioners’ liability for damages and profits under a decree for an accounting by infringers of a patent.

Respondent, complainant below, is the owner of a patent, number 1,182,739, .for the making of laminated glass, which will crack, but not shatter. The product is better known as “safety” or “shatter-proof” glass, and is used very largely in the making of automobiles. In the process of manufacture, a sheet of pyralin or celluloid is sandwiched between two thin sheets of plate glass, each % of an inch thick, the pyralin being cemented to the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. King v. . TalbotNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. U. S. Plywood-Champion Papers Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API