Legal Opinion

Arlac Dry Stencil Corp. v. A. B. Dick Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 17, 1931No. 4450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

A. B. Dick Company, assignee of Letters Patent No. 1,536,982, issued to Edward W. Hill, brought this suit for infringement. From an interlocutory decree holding-certain claims valid and infringed, the defendants appealed.

The patent is for a “stencil-sheet” which in its elemental form is a sheet of paper, of typewriter size, so prepared that letters can be cut or impressed upon its surface by the letter-hammers of a typewriter and, when completed,' the stenciled words can be reproduced on a plain sheet placed beneath it by passing an ink roll over the stencil-sheet in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  2. A. B. Dick Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. Duplicating Machine & Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API