Commonwealth v. Bienvenu
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
A Superior Court jury returned guilty verdicts against the defendants, Jerry Bienvenu and Gina Kapolis, for trafficking in a controlled substance (cocaine) in an amount of twenty-eight grams or more. On appeal, the defendants claim that the judge erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence, in allowing a police officer to testify as an expert witness, and in failing to sever the trials of the codefendants. Kapolis also raises a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence against her.3 We affirm both defendants’ convictions.
The following facts were adduced through the testimony of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. Va Meng JoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. LittleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. MontalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. CrappsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.