Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bienvenu

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 2, 2005No. 04-P-420PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

A Superior Court jury returned guilty verdicts against the defendants, Jerry Bienvenu and Gina Kapolis, for trafficking in a controlled substance (cocaine) in an amount of twenty-eight grams or more. On appeal, the defendants claim that the judge erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence, in allowing a police officer to testify as an expert witness, and in failing to sever the trials of the codefendants. Kapolis also raises a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence against her.3 We affirm both defendants’ convictions.

The following facts were adduced through the testimony of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. MoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. Va Meng JoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. GarciaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. LittleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. MontalvoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. CrappsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. DeJesusMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API