Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moran

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 18, 1982PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

The defendants appeal from convictions, following a jury trial, of murder in the first degree and unarmed robbery. The murder convictions were based on the felony-murder doctrine. The defendants argue that that doctrine, as it has previously been applied in this Commonwealth, is unconstitutional and therefore that it was error for the judge to instruct the jury on felony-murder. We hold that the doctrine is constitutional. However, we examine the felony-murder doctrine as it applies to the common law felony of unarmed robbery, and hold that it was error to instruct the jury that the malice…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MontanezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  3. Commonwealth v. GunterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. JudgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API