Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Little

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 14, 2009PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.

The Commonwealth brought a complaint against Christopher Little, the defendant, charging him with possession of a Class D substance (marijuana) with the intent to distribute. At trial, Little contested the charge only insofar as it alleged an intent to distribute. The Commonwealth called an experienced narcotics investigator, Detective Thomas Keating, who testified that in his opinion, the facts of Little’s case were consistent with an intent to distribute. Little filed a motion for a required finding of not guilty, which the trial judge denied. The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Simon v. SolomonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. MatteiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. DancyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. MacDonaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API