Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Garcia

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1991PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendants, Saturnino Garcia and Alberto Heredia, appeal from convictions of trafficking in cocaine in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E. Both defendants contend that the trial judge improperly denied their motions to suppress cocaine seized from the trunk of the vehicle which Garcia drove and in which Heredia was a passenger. Heredia also claims error in the judge’s denial of a motion to suppress statements he made while in the police station. Garcia claims that the judge should have allowed his motion for a required finding of not guilty. We agree with Garcia that the evidence against…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Florida v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. SantanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. Warner-Lambert Co. v. Execuquest Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. State of Iowa v. William Arthur DewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API