Legal Opinion
Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 25, 2013No. 09-891CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, J.
Plaintiff, Chapman Law Firm, LPA, asserts three claims1 against defendant arising from plaintiffs contract with the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to provide management and marketing services for single-family homes in Ohio and Michigan. Plaintiff seeks compensation for: (1) costs that plaintiff incurred during two stop work order periods issued in response to bid protests filed at the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), (2) costs that plaintiff incurred as a result of constructive changes to the parties’ contract, and (3) what appear to be…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Horn & Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Advanced Powder Solutions, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.