Legal Opinion

Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 2001No. COA00-96PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Rich, Rich & Nance (plaintiff) instituted this action on 15 June 1998 seeking specific performance of an agreement set forth in an addendum to a real estate sale contract.

Plaintiff owned a parcel of land consisting of 11.89 acres commonly known as “Walking Horse Subdivision,” which had preliminary, but not final plat approval. Plaintiff entered into a contract with LFM Properties (LFM) on 5 August 1994, wherein LFM agreed to purchase the property at a price of $75,000.00. Pursuant to discussions of the parties regarding the ultimate use of the property, plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rodin v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. International Minerals & Metals Corp. v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Village of Pinehurst v. Regional Investments of Moore, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Rawls v. EarlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rich, Rich & Nance v. Carolina Construction Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API