International Minerals & Metals Corp. v. Weinstein
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDjsNNy, J.
The only assignment of error brought forward and argued in the appellants’ brief is based upon their exceptions to the failure of the court below to sustain their motion for judgment as of nonsuit.
The defendants contend that the “supplemental oral agreement” left the delivery date indefinite, and converted the original contract into one for the purchase and sale of materials at a stated price, delivery to be made at the convenience of the seller. We do not concur in this view.
We construe the supplemental oral agreement to do nothing more than to extend the time of delivery temporarily and to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Winders v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Erskine v. . Motors Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Erskine v. Chevrolet Motors Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Rocky Mount Savings & Trust Co. v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- General Tire and Rubber Co. v. Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Erskine v. . Motors Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- United States Ex Rel. F. E. Robinson Co. of N. C., Inc. v. Alpha-ContinentalDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1967
- Rodin v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Digh v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.