Legal Opinion

State v. Gantt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 30, 1986PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

O’HERN, J.

We granted certification in this case to determine whether the State must prove that a handgun used in an armed robbery was operable before a court may impose a sentence under the Graves Act, which requires mandatory-minimum terms of imprisonment for persons convicted of designated crimes involving the use of a “firearm.” The case arises in the context of an unarmed accomplice’s liability when his armed co-felon is never apprehended and the weapon is never recovered or produced. We agree with the courts below that proof of a gun’s operability…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. State v. Des MaretsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. State v. IngramSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. TischioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. State v. ValentinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. ToweySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API