Springer v. Sodestrom
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WAGLER, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages for the wrongful death of their twenty-two-months’-old child. Judgment for defendant was entered upon a jury’s verdict. Thereafter, plaintiffs moved for a new trial on three grounds: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence; (2) that the verdict and judgment were against law, and (3) errors in law. Within the time prescribed by law a minute order was entered by the clerk as follows: “In the above entitled action, the motion for new…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Katz v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- David Irish, a Minor, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Clifford L. Irish, and Clifford L. Irish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Conroy v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Stockwell v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Adams v. American President Lines, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.