Legal Opinion

Adams v. American President Lines, Ltd.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1944No. S. F. 16950PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff, a seaman, sought to recover damages for the alleged negligence of his employer, under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A., secs. 51-59), which is made applicable to seamen by the Jones Act (46 U.S.C.A., sec. 688). The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,750. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The plaintiff appealed from the order.

The order granting a new trial specified, as the sole grounds therefor, errors of law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the defendant. In the absence of the specification…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jamison v. EncarnacionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kruse v. White BrothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Meier v. Ross General HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API