Legal Opinion

Meads v. Stott

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1951Published

1Opinion of the Court

193 Or. 509 (1952)

238 P.2d 256

239 P.2d 594

MEADS

v.

STOTT

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued November 15, 1951.

Reversed with directions December 5, 1951.

Petition for rehearing denied January 9, 1952.

U.S. Balentine, of Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Mark Simons, of Klamath Falls.

R.B. Maxwell argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Farrens & Maxwell, and W.J. Moshofsky, all of Klamath Falls.

Before BRAND, Chief Justice, and HAY, ROSSMAN, LUSK and TOOZE, Justices.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

TOOZE, J.

This is a suit by Frank R. Meads, as plaintiff, against…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Flower v. BarnekoffOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Tigglebeck v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hunter v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API