Legal Opinion

Plasticolor Molded Products, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

District Court, C.D. California

Decided April 25, 1991No. 85-3863 AK (Tx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONSENT JUDGMENT

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.

This cause, having come before the court for entry of final judgment with the consent of plaintiff-counterdefendant, Plasticolor Molded Products, Inc. (“Plasticolor”) and defendant-counterclaimant, Ford Motor Company (“Ford”), the court having been advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED:

1. This court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter hereof.

2. The Court’s interlocutory opinion of April 28, 1989, 713 F.Supp. 1329, is hereby vacated.

3. Plasticolor, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Plasticolor Molded Products v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sega Enterprises Ltd., a Japanese Corporation v. Accolade, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. And Oxxford Clothes Xx, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. Lloyd Design Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Reebok International Ltd. v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  5. Chrysler Corp. v. VanzantDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API