Chrysler Corp. v. Vanzant
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER (1) GRANTING VANZANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTS I AND II OF CHRYSLER’S COMPLAINT, AND ON THAT PORTION OF COUNT III WHICH STATES A CLAIM FOR STATE UNFAIR COMPETITION; AND (2) DENYING CHRYSLER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION OF THE ISSUE OF ITS GRILLE DESIGN’S NON-FUNCTIONALITY.
TIMLIN, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are two motions for summary judgment, one filed by plaintiff and one filed by defendant. The Court has read and considered plaintiff and defendant’s moving papers, defendant and plaintiffs opposition, and plaintiff and defendant’s reply…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Laboratory Products, Inc. v. Medax International, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- E.S.S. Entertainment 2000, Inc. v. Rock Star Videos, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Finance Express LLC v. Nowcom Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Peninsula Community Health Services v. Olympic Peninsula Health Services PSDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Quoc Viet Foods, Inc. v. VV Foods, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016