Legal Opinion
Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 25, 2006No. AC 25700PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, Pro Park, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, Gebrehiwet Mokon-nen. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court improperly charged the jury on the plaintiffs religious *627discrimination claim and (2) there was insufficient evidence to support the plaintiffs negligent misrepresentation claim.1 We agree with the defendant, reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the matter for a new trial on the discrimination claim.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jacobs v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Tornaquindici v. KeggiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Savings Bank v. Ralion Financial Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Crone v. ConnellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Sutcliffe v. FleetBoston Financial Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Savoie v. DaoudConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Milardo v. KowaleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.