Legal Opinion
Crone v. Connelly
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 4, 2003No. AC 22156PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Leonard L. Crone, on this false arrest claim, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants, James A. Connelly, Thomas Sweeney, Richard Mancini and Lester H. Garrett. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict by concluding that (1) there was insufficient evidence to establish that they had conspired to violate the plaintiffs rights and (2) probable cause did exist to arrest the plaintiff. We conclude that under the facts of this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Crone v. ConnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. WeberConnecticut Superior Court · 2004
- Crone v. ConnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Skrobacz v. SweeneyConnecticut Superior Court · 2003