Legal Opinion
Veridyne Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 12, 2008No. Nos. 06-150C, 07-647CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case concerns a 1998 contract modification that extended a 1995 contract for one year and four additional option years, Modification 0023 (“Mod 0023”) to Contract No. DTMA91-95-C-00024 (“the Contract”) between Veridyne Corporation (“plaintiff’) and the Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration (“MARAD”). Plaintiff was the incumbent contractor. In order to continue with plaintiff, both plaintiff and MAR-AD knew that the Contract would be opened to competition unless plaintiff satisfied a $3-million qualifying limitation to the contract…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Threshold Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.