Legal Opinion
Veridyne Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 16, 2009No. Nos. 06-150C, 07-647CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MILLER, Judge.
This case concerns a 1998 contract modification that extended a 1995 contract for one year and four additional option years, Modification 0023 (“Mod 0023”) to Contract No. DTMA91-95-C-00024 (“the Contract”) between Veridyne Corporation (“plaintiff’) and the Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration (“MARAD”). Plaintiff was the incumbent contractor. In order to continue using plaintiff, both plaintiff and MAR-AD knew that the Contract would be opened to competition unless plaintiff satisfied a $3-million qualifying limitation to the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Martin J. Simko Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Mitsui Foods, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Te-Moak Bands of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Second Chance Body Armor Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hanover Insurance Company (The) v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Veridyne Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Board of Supervisors of Issaquena County, Mississippi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.