Legal Opinion
Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 29, 1939No. Nos. 166, 167, 603PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler
delivered the opinion of the Court..
These are patent infringement suits brought by ¿the Toledo Pressed Steel Company, owner of Withrow and Close Patent No. 1,732,708, issued October 22, 1929, for a burner for use in outdoor warning signals such as construction. torches and truck flares. The first two suits were brought in the federal court for the northern district of Ohio. It filed an opinion indicating the facts that it deemed established by the evidence and without formal findings held the patent valid and infringed by the Bolser and Kari-Keen flares respectively sold by the defendants.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Smith v. Dravo Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Blisscraft of Hollywood v. United Plastics Company, Marmax Products Corp., and Morris Shapiro, Doing Business as Great Eastern Housewares CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.