Palomo v. J.R. Simplot Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the Industrial Commission’s order that J.R. Simplot Co. (Simplot) pay disability benefits to the heirs of Nancy Palomo (Palomo). We reverse the Industrial Commission’s decision and remand the case to the Industrial Commission for entry of an order terminating the payment of benefits to Palomo as of the date of her death.
I
BACKGROUND
Palomo injured her wrists and elbows as a result of repeatedly lifting boxes during the coui’se of her employment with Simplot. Palomo sought disability benefits from Simplot and Idaho’s Industrial Special Indemnity Fund…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- DeLancey v. DeLanceyIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Smith v. J.B. Parson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Combs v. Kelly LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Twin Lakes Village Property Association, Inc. v. CrowleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Phinney v. Shoshone Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Daugharty v. Post Falls Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Daugharty v. Post Falls Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Keith Mayer v. TPC Holdings, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.