Legal Opinion

DeLancey v. DeLancey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1986No. 15792PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTLEY, Justice.

Respondent La lad DeLancey obtained a default divorce from appellant Earl R. De-Lancey, Jr., who neither appeared nor had representation in the divorce proceedings. The Decree of Divorce, which La lad’s attorney drafted, distributed a pickup truck to Earl and a car to La lad. The decree obligated Earl to pay community indebtedness on the car of $6,300, to be paid , in monthly installments of $197, with the further proviso that Earl pay $100 per month alimony upon completion of the car payments.

The DeLanceys had purchased the car during their marriage. At the time of purchase…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Rutter v. McLaughlinIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Beal v. Mars Larsen Ranch Corp., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. JR Simplot Company v. ChambersIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Suchan v. SuchanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Chavez v. BarrusIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Bondy v. LevyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Maroun v. Wyreless Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. A & B Irrigation District v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 2012

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API