Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daugharty v. Post Falls Highway District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2000No. 24932Published

1DissentChief Justice Trout

Because I believe the provisions for triggering the reversionary interest in the quitclaim deed have been met, I respectfully dissent from the Court’s opinion in this case.

According to the plain language of the deed, the property was granted to Highway District No. 4, subject to the following limitations:(1) This property shall be used only as a site for highway district office, storage, garage and similar highway district purposes; and(2) On the dissolution of said highway district or upon cessation of the district in the use of said strip of land, it shall revert back to the grantors.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Palomo v. J.R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API