Legal Opinion

Herndon v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1990No. 89-63PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the writ of certiorari in this case to review a holding by the Court of Criminal Appeals that a defendant charged with first degree robbery was entitled to have the jury instructed on the lesser included offense of third degree robbery because there was evidence that the gun he used in the robbery was not loaded. We disagree, and we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals and remand the case to that Court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Richard Herndon was convicted of first degree robbery; he appealed and raised the issue of whether the trial…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lidge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Ex Parte LidgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. State v. GanttSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. State v. LeviSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  5. State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. Hiler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. McCaskill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API