Hiler v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
The State of Alabama petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision reversing Beryl R. Hiler’s conviction for falsely reporting an incident, a violation of § 13A-11-11, Ala.Code 1975. Hiler v. State, 44 So.3d 535 (Ala.Crim.App.2009). We granted certiorari review to consider, as a material question of first impression, whether the plain language of § 13A-11-11 prohibits Hiler’s prosecution for falsely reporting an incident. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Facts and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy SheriffsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Sheffield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Ex Parte BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Ex parte State of Alabama.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.