Legal Opinion
MacOmb County v. AFSCME Council 25 Locals 411 & 893
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 12, 2013No. Docket 144303PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, C.J.
The public employment relations act (PERA)1 requires public employers to bargain with their employees’ designated representatives concerning the “terms and conditions of employment,” including the calculation of retirement benefits. Failure to do so constitutes an unfair labor practice. The unfair labor practice complaints at issue in this case arise out of the Macomb County Retirement Commission’s decision to change the actuarial table used to calculate joint and survivor retirement benefits for employees retiring after July 1, 2007. We hold that the respondents did not commit an unfair…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rita Kendzierski v. County of MacOmbMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Harper Woods Retirees Association v. City of Harper WoodsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Van Buren County Education Ass'n & Decatur Educational Support Personnel Ass'n v. Decatur Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- Wayne County v. Afscme Local 3317Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Mount Pleasant Public Schools v. Michigan AFSCME Council 25Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.