Legal Opinion
Wayne County v. Afscme Local 3317
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 28, 2018No. 339493PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, P.J.
*617 In the midst of a financial emergency, respondent, Wayne County (the County), entered into a consent agreement with Michigan's treasurer (the State Treasurer) under the Local Financial Stability and Choice Act (Act 436), MCL 141.1541 et seq. , as enacted by 2012 PA 436 . Pursuant to the consent agreement, the County was temporarily given a reprieve from being subject to mandatory collective bargaining under the public employment relations act (PERA), MCL 423.201 et seq. , for a period that will ultimately span approximately three years, ending October 1, 2018. The County's position is that…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Rovas v. SBC MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re Complaint of Rovas Against SbcMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Rockwell v. Crestwood School District Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Petersen Financial LLC v. City of KentwoodMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Arthur Breithaupt v. Howard Melam Family LpMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Assn of Home Help Care Agencies v. Dept of Health & Human ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Charter Co of Wayne v. Wayne Co Retirement CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Highfield Beach at Lake Michigan v. Scott E SandersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.