Legal Opinion

Central Construction Co. v. Hartman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 1935No. Civ. No. 9630PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TUTTLE, J., pro tem.

This action was brought to determine the rights of the parties in respect to certain executory contracts for the sale of real property, appellant and respondent being successive assignees of the vendor under said contracts.

Capuchino Golf Corporation, in 1926, was the owner of a tract of land in San Mateo County, and during that year engaged Stansbury Contracting Company to furnish materials and perform labor in improving said tract. In 1929 the Golf Corporation owed the Contracting Company approximately $152,000.

During this time the Golf Corporation had entered into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Graham Paper Co. v. PembrokeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Keese v. BeardsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. In re the Estate of PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vournas v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Ass'n v. Hirsch Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Adler v. Manor Healthcare Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API