Martinez v. Cox
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court upon his allegation that he has fully completed service of his sentence of imprisonment “for a term of not less than two nor more than ten years * * * all of said sentence except the first eighteen months is hereby suspended.”
Sections 42-1-54 and 55, N.M.S.A.1953, permit an allowance of certain “good time” and “meritorious good time” to be Credited upon the time a prisoner serves. It has been stipulated that petitioner has earned two months “good time” and three months and twenty-four days of “meritorious good time,” and, that if…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ruth Etta Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- Iowa Mutual Tornado Insurance v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- Edmunds v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Compton v. LytleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Martinez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PetersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.