Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Cox

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1965No. 7919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus in the Supreme Court upon his allegation that he has fully completed service of his sentence of imprisonment “for a term of not less than two nor more than ten years * * * all of said sentence except the first eighteen months is hereby suspended.”

Sections 42-1-54 and 55, N.M.S.A.1953, permit an allowance of certain “good time” and “meritorious good time” to be Credited upon the time a prisoner serves. It has been stipulated that petitioner has earned two months “good time” and three months and twenty-four days of “meritorious good time,” and, that if…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ruth Etta Witt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Iowa Mutual Tornado Insurance v. FischerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  5. Edmunds v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Compton v. LytleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. ThomsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Lopez Ex Rel. Lopez v. BarrerasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Martinez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. PetersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API