Legal Opinion

Ruth Etta Witt v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1961No. 17051_1PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a first offender, was sentenced to five years imprisonment for importing two and one-quarter ounces of heroin from Mexico, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174. She asserts (1) that the narcotics were obtained by an unlawful search and seizure; and should have been suppressed on appellant’s motion; (2) without the narcotics in evidence, there was insufficient evidence to convict her; (3) 26 U.S.C.A. § 7237(d) prohibiting suspension of sentence in order to grant probation in certain narcotics offenses, in its unequal operation (by giving the United States Attorney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. The Apollon.Supreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Charles E. Blackford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Anthony Joseph Munich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Barbara Jean Henderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API